Gaza footballers enter World Cup month with their sport in ruins
The 2026 FIFA World Cup opens on 11 June in North America as FIFA’s largest tournament, but Gaza’s football community reaches it from a position of devastation rather than celebration. FIFA lists the tournament as a 48-team competition hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, while Palestine remains outside the finals after a qualifying cycle played under war, displacement and travel constraints. The Palestinian Football Association says hundreds of footballers have been killed and many facilities damaged or destroyed since October 2023; those figures are politically contested and cannot be independently verified from inside Gaza, where foreign press access remains barred. The story is less about a missed tournament berth than about football’s institutional problem: world sport presents itself as universal, yet Palestinian players, clubs and officials have struggled to keep even the basic infrastructure of the game intact.
For Belgian football fans, clubs and families watching the World Cup, Gaza is a reminder that the tournament’s global language of inclusion sits beside unresolved questions about war, occupation and sporting access. Belgium’s national team is in the same tournament, so Belgian viewers meet this story through football, not only diplomacy. It also matters to Belgian voters, NGOs, Jewish and Palestinian communities, and EU-policy readers because Belgium and EU institutions continue to debate how law, humanitarian policy and cultural life should respond to Gaza.
Gaza Strip (Palestinian coastal enclave under Israeli blockade since 2007) is the centre of the football and humanitarian damage described here. FIFA (Zurich-based world football governing body, founded in 1904) runs the World Cup and recognises national football associations. The Palestinian Football Association (Palestine’s football governing body, a FIFA member since 1998) organises the national team and domestic competitions. The 2026 FIFA World Cup (11 June-19 July 2026, hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico) is the first 48-team men’s World Cup. The Israel Football Association (Israel’s FIFA and UEFA member association) is the subject of Palestinian complaints over clubs in settlements and discrimination allegations. Jibril Rajoub (Palestinian Football Association president since 2008) has led calls for FIFA action. The International Court of Justice (UN court in The Hague) issued a 19 July 2024 advisory opinion on Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory.
Background
Palestinian football has repeatedly been shaped by conflict and movement controls. The Palestinian Football Association joined FIFA as a full member in 1998, after the Oslo-era creation of Palestinian institutions. AP reported that the association said former national team player Mohammed Barakat was killed in Gaza in March 2024, when the PFA’s war toll for athletes was already rising. FIFA opened investigations in October 2024 into Palestinian complaints about discrimination and Israeli clubs in settlements. The International Court of Justice’s 19 July 2024 advisory opinion later found Israel’s continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful, sharpening the legal context around settlement-linked sport.
The wider picture
Gaza’s football crisis reflects a larger fight over whether international institutions can enforce norms consistently when powerful alliances are involved. The comparison with Russia’s 2022 sports exclusion is central to Palestinian and campaign-group arguments, while FIFA’s caution mirrors wider Western hesitation over converting legal and humanitarian condemnation into hard sanctions against Israel.
Why now
The trigger is the opening of the 2026 FIFA World Cup on 11 June, which places Gaza’s shattered football scene beside the sport’s biggest celebration. The timing also follows FIFA’s recent pre-tournament meetings and continuing controversy over Palestinian access to football institutions.
What to watch
Watch whether Palestinian officials or allied football associations use the World Cup window to revive demands for FIFA action, whether protests appear around matches, and whether FIFA makes any further statement on settlement-club or discrimination complaints before the final on 19 July.
Opposing perspectives
- Palestinian Football Association
The Palestinian Football Association argues that football cannot be separated from the conditions under which Palestinian players live and compete. Its position is that deaths, damaged facilities, movement restrictions and settlement-linked clubs create a sporting-rights issue that FIFA must handle through its own statutes, not only through diplomatic language about peace.
- FIFA leadership
FIFA’s institutional line is that football bodies should be cautious about trying to settle geopolitical disputes through sporting bans. FIFA has investigated Palestinian complaints, but its approach stresses legal process, member-association rules and the risk that a global football body overreaches if it replaces courts or governments.
- Israeli authorities
Israeli authorities frame military action in Gaza as a response to Hamas and other armed groups, and the Israeli military says it targets military objectives while blaming Hamas for operating among civilians. That frame rejects the idea that sports sanctions should follow automatically from war damage attributed by Palestinian institutions.
Sources & evidence
- Al Jazeera - World celebrates, but Gaza watches the World Cup from a distance · 2026-06-11
- FIFA - FIFA World Cup 26 tournament and match schedule pages
- The Guardian - Palestine FA officials denied entry to Canada for Fifa pre-World Cup meeting · 2026-04-16
- AP News - Palestinian soccer federation says former national team player killed in an Israeli airstrike · 2024-03-13
- Le Monde - Nearly 1,000 dead in Gaza since start of ceasefire illusion · 2026-06-10
- The Guardian - Fifa investigates Israeli discrimination after Palestinian FA calls for sanctions · 2024-10-03
- International Court of Justice - Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Pa · 2024-07-19
