belgiumpulse
Search
Image illustrating: Russian soldiers in Ukraine (editorial)
← International
ANALYSIS

Russian state rewards commanders accused of killing their own troops

A new investigation says Russia has elevated or decorated officers accused by soldiers, relatives and leaked records of killing, torturing or deliberately sacrificing their own men in Ukraine. The central claim is not simply battlefield brutality against Ukrainian forces, but an internal command system in which punishment killings, suicide assignments and impunity have become tools of discipline. Earlier reporting by independent Russian investigators said they had identified 101 servicemen accused of murdering, torturing or fatally punishing comrades and had verified at least 150 deaths. U.S. officials have also said Russia executed soldiers who refused orders, though they did not provide case details. The Kremlin has denied claims of Russian indiscipline and has portrayed abuse as a Ukrainian problem. For Europe, the story matters because it points to a Russian war model built on coercive manpower, not only equipment or ideology.

Belgium Impulse Editorial·12 June 2026·3 min read·6 sources
Key signal

For Belgian voters, defence planners and families following the war, the story clarifies the kind of Russian military culture that EU and NATO policy is trying to deter. Belgium is not a battlefield actor, but Brussels hosts NATO and EU decision-making, while Belgian taxpayers help finance sanctions, Ukraine aid and military readiness. If Russia sustains offensives through coercion and expendable manpower, European support debates become less about a short crisis and more about a prolonged security contest.

Zeroers is a term used in reporting on Russian army slang for commanders or enforcers alleged to make soldiers disappear, die in punishment missions or be recorded as battlefield casualties. The Russian Armed Forces are Russia's regular military, deployed in Ukraine since Moscow's full-scale invasion on 24 February 2022. Ukraine is the invaded state whose eastern and southern regions remain the main battlefield. The Wagner Group was a Russian mercenary organisation led by Yevgeny Prigozhin until his 2023 death and known for recruiting prisoners for high-casualty assaults. Vladimir Putin is Russia's president and commander-in-chief. Donbas is the eastern Ukrainian industrial region covering Donetsk and Luhansk, a central front since 2014. Bakhmut is the Donetsk city where Wagner and Russian forces sustained heavy losses in 2022-23. OHCHR is the UN human-rights office documenting wartime detention, torture and execution allegations. EUMAM Ukraine is the EU military assistance mission created in 2022 to train Ukrainian forces in EU member states.

Background

Coercive discipline has deep precedents in Russian and Soviet military practice. Soviet Order No. 227 of 28 July 1942 created blocking detachments and penal units under the slogan that retreat without orders was forbidden. During Russia's 2022 mobilisation, independent reporting and official Russian decrees showed Moscow tightening penalties for surrender, desertion and refusal to fight. Wagner's prison-recruitment model in 2022-23 then normalised the use of convicts in high-casualty assaults around Bakhmut. UN experts said in March 2023 they had received information that some recruited prisoners were executed or seriously injured for trying to escape.

The wider picture

The broader issue is Russia's ability to convert human expendability into strategic staying power. Western governments often measure the war through tanks, drones and ammunition, but manpower discipline is also decisive. A military that punishes refusal with death can keep attacking longer than a conventional morale analysis might suggest, though at the cost of internal cohesion and future accountability.

Why now

The story is timely because the 12 June investigation shifts attention from Russian battlefield losses to the alleged career rewards for commanders linked to internal brutality. That makes the issue less a catalogue of abuses and more a question about incentives inside Russia's war machine.

OIS Intelligence

What to watch

Watch for named sanctions proposals, UN reporting on Russian detention and execution allegations, further investigative databases of commanders, and any Russian military-prosecutor action. The most important signal would be whether accused officers continue to receive public honours, promotions or command responsibilities.

Opposing perspectives

  1. Investigative and human-rights researchers

    The investigation frames the alleged killings as a command-system problem, not isolated battlefield excess. The strongest version of this view is that repeated testimony, leaked records and complaint data point to institutional impunity: officers who terrorise their own ranks can still be useful to Moscow if they keep assaults moving.

  2. Kremlin and Russian state narrative

    The Kremlin has denied claims of Russian indiscipline and argues that abuse and battlefield lawlessness are Ukrainian problems. Its strongest argument is that hostile governments and exile media have incentives to discredit Russian forces, while wartime videos and testimonies can be selectively edited or impossible to verify independently.

  3. Western security officials

    U.S. officials have presented executions and threats against retreating soldiers as evidence of Russian morale and leadership failures. Their strongest reading is strategic: if Moscow needs coercion to sustain offensives, Ukraine's partners should expect costly Russian attacks to continue but also recognise the fragility beneath them.

  4. International humanitarian law community

    UN experts and monitors treat alleged executions, torture and prisoner abuse as legal questions, not propaganda points. Their strongest frame is that all parties must investigate credible allegations, but Russia's opacity and lack of access make command responsibility especially difficult to test during the war.

Sources & evidence